中新網(wǎng)北1月6日電(蔣鯉)近日，美國(guó)家航空航局(NASA)局長(zhǎng)比爾?尼陳書宣稱，中“正處于場(chǎng)太空競(jìng)”，還警美國(guó)不要中國(guó)“打科學(xué)研究幌子”抵月球上的個(gè)地方。2022年12月13日，美國(guó)巫真航天局局比爾·尼森在華盛舉行的美領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人峰太空論壇發(fā)表講話這已經(jīng)不尼爾森第次炒作“國(guó)太空威論”了。去年7月，這位NASA局長(zhǎng)接受采訪幾山公聲稱小心中國(guó)占領(lǐng)球”；在國(guó)眾議院款委員會(huì)證會(huì)上，錢心切的爾森更是口開河，稱中國(guó)很長(zhǎng)“偷竊美國(guó)的航技術(shù)。一以來，中航天事業(yè)發(fā)展都遵著獨(dú)立自、自力更的道路，時(shí)深化高平國(guó)際交與合作。國(guó)官方已外宣布，批國(guó)際合項(xiàng)目載荷于2023年進(jìn)入中空間站，在積極進(jìn)培訓(xùn)國(guó)外天員的相準(zhǔn)備工作然而，中秉承的開共享發(fā)展念被美國(guó)些政客官頻頻“抹”，究其層原因，是中國(guó)在空領(lǐng)域的展讓美國(guó)到壓力—根據(jù)美國(guó)治新聞網(wǎng)報(bào)道，美的阿爾忒斯計(jì)劃依一系列仍開發(fā)中的系統(tǒng)和設(shè)，如果出任何重大期或紕漏都有可能美國(guó)在登方面落后中國(guó)。而NASA的登月時(shí)間表特朗普政時(shí)開始已推遲了一。為此，國(guó)在國(guó)際天合作上置障礙，意制裁別航天機(jī)構(gòu)出臺(tái)法案制與中國(guó)展航天合與交流，雙標(biāo)做法言而喻。是，美國(guó)深蒂固的權(quán)思維和尚爭(zhēng)”文作祟，不在經(jīng)濟(jì)、技等領(lǐng)域壓中國(guó)，空也被當(dāng)遏制中國(guó)角斗場(chǎng)。旦把對(duì)方定為競(jìng)爭(zhēng)手，與之共存”的愿和空間會(huì)急劇壓。為在航領(lǐng)域稱霸美國(guó)早在2014年就啟動(dòng)所謂“地球同軌道空間勢(shì)感知計(jì)”，對(duì)他衛(wèi)星進(jìn)行視竊聽。國(guó)政府還然將太空定為“作疆域”，建太空軍太空司令，大力研部署進(jìn)攻武器，甚和商業(yè)公合作，來足其國(guó)防情報(bào)機(jī)構(gòu)益增長(zhǎng)的求。挑動(dòng)空軍備競(jìng)，加劇太軍事化風(fēng)，美國(guó)給空和平與全造成了大挑戰(zhàn)。為負(fù)責(zé)任國(guó)，美國(guó)早日摒棄戰(zhàn)思維，確看待他航天成就積極探索空國(guó)際合，讓太空福人類，非成為滿其稱霸野的擂臺(tái)。Hegemonic U.S. thinking pervades to space(ECNS) -- NASA Administrator Bill Nelson recently declared that China and the U.S. were in a “space race” and warned that the U.S. better watch out that China doesn’t "get to a place on the moon under the guise of scientific research."Nelson has peddled the "China threat" in space more than once. Last July, he blatantly claimed that China is trying to “occupy the moon,” and during a House Appropriations Committee hearing, the senior official said he wanted more money for NASA and alleged that China is "good at stealing" American technology.China has long been taking the path of independence and self-reliance in its space development, while deepening high-level international exchanges and cooperation. It has made an announcement that the first batch of payloads of projects under international cooperation would be delivered to China's space station for experiments by 2023. Meanwhile, the country has been actively preparing for training foreign astronauts.Frequent smearing by some U.S. politicians and officials of China's open and shared development in space may attribute to the following two issues.On the one hand, the U.S. has felt the pressure as China's space technology has developed fast over the past years.According to the U.S. media outlet Politico, the country’s Artemis I mission, which is counting on a series of new systems and equipment that are still under development, could risk falling behind China if there is any significant delays or mishaps. Besides, NASA’s moon-landing timeline has already slipped a year from the Trump administration.As such, the U.S. has laid barriers on international space cooperation and imposed sanctions on other space agencies. It introduced bills to restrict space cooperation and exchanges with China, revealing its double standards.On the other hand, deep-rooted hegemonic thinking of the U.S. and contention culture make it resolute in suppressing China in the fields of economy, science and technology, and even in space.In order to maintain its hegemony in space, the U.S. launched a Geosynchronous Space Situational Awareness Program in 2014 to surveil other countries’ satellites. It also recognized space as a "domain of war," establishing a space command center and space force, and developing and deploying offensive space weapons.In addition, it has cooperated with private companies in order to meet the increasing demand of its national defense departments and intelligent agencies.The U.S. is inciting the arms race in space, aggravating the risk of militarization of space and posing a major challenge to peace and security. It should abandon this Cold War mentality, actively participate in international space cooperation, and allow space to benefit humankind instead of making it a platform to satisfy its hegemonic ambition. 編輯?
